Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 Association of Coal Mining Exposure and Trauma with Depression, anxiety, and PTSD

From: Psychological morbidity among coal miners compared to other occupations in Appalachia

 

Sample

Frequency

n (%)

Unadjusted models

Adjusted models

Depression (PHQ8 ≥ 10)

    

All respondents

1428

217 (15%)

  

 Any coal mining occupation

  

OR (95% CI)

  No

1201

164 (14%)

Referent

Referent

  Yes

227

53 (23%)

1.93 (1.4, 2.7)

1.62 (1.1, 2.4)

Anxiety (GAD7 ≥ 10)

    

All respondents

1428

139 (10%)

  

 Any coal mining occupation

  

OR (95% CI)

  No

1201

103 (9%)

Referent

Referent

  Yes

227

36 (16%)

2.01 (1.3, 3.0)

1.73 (1.1, 2.7)

Post-traumatic Stress (PTSD screener ≥ 3)

   

Respondents reporting trauma

711

184 (26%)

  

 Any coal mining occupation

  

OR (95% CI)

  No

584

152 (26%)

Referent

Referent

  Yes

127

32 (25%)

0.96 (0.6, 1.5)

0.80 (0.5, 1.3)

  1. PHQ-8 has a range of 0–24 points. GAD-7 has a range of 0–21 points; PTSD has a range of 0–5 points.
  2. OR = Odds ratio Odds ratios from logistic regression models.
  3. Adjusted logistic regression models for depression and anxiety control for trauma (work-related or non-work related), age, smoking status, obesity, and educational level (see Table 1). Models for PTSD are limited to those reporting trauma; the adjusted model includes age, smoking status, and educational level.