Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 7 Accordance between occupational physician’s and semi-objective SWS#-grading stratified by adequacy of vocational rehabilitative decisions

From: Vocational rehabilitative decisions after symptoms and findings consistent with hand-arm vibration syndrome in the Swedish surveillance system – a mixed-method design

Vocational Rehabilitative Decision

SWS underestimated

n (%)

SWS correct

n (%)

SWS S-O 2–3

n (%)

Adequate

   

No rehab needed

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Rehabilitation accepted

3 (3)

23 (30)

26 (14)

Employee no longer exposed

0 (0)

3 (4)

3 (2)

Alternative follow-up

6 (6)

11 (14)

17 (9)

Already known HAVS

1 (1)

3 (4)

4 (2)

Semi-adequate

   

Medical investigation commenced

21 (19)

14 (18)

35 (19)

Shorter period until next MCV

18 (17)

5 (7)

23 (13)

Inadequate due to patient

   

Rehabilitation declined

9 (8)

7 (9)

16 (9)

Inadequate due to physician

   

Individual recommendations only

20 (19)

5 (7)

25 (14)

No action despite findings

30 (28)

5 (7)

35 (19)

Total

108 (100)

76 (100)

184 (100)

  1. #Stockholm Workshop Scale Sensorineural [15]