Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 9 Risk of bias assessment

From: Bridging the knowledge gap! Health outcomes in informal e-waste workers

Study

Internal validity – bias

Internal validity – confounder

Perfor-mance bias

Detection bias

Attrition bias

Reporting bias

Selection bias

Igharo et al. [2018]

high

low

low

high

low

low

high

Armah et al. [2019]

low

low

low

high

low

low

high

Eguchi et al. [2015]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Zheng et al. [2017]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Nti et al. [2020]

low

high

low

low

low

low

high

Yuan et al. [2008]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Wang, H et al. [2010]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Kuntawee et al. [2020]

low

low

low

low

low

low

low

Wang, Y et al. [2018]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Yohannessen et al. [2019]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Fischer et al. [2020]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Burns et al. [2016]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Feldt et al. [2014]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Igharo et al. [2020]

high

high

low

low

low

low

high

Zhao et al. [2021]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Carlson et al. [2021]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Neitzel et al. [2020]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Acquah et al. [2021]

low

high

low

high

low

low

high

Eguchi et al. [2014]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Mishra [2019]

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

low

low

low

n.a.

Ohajinwa et al. [2017]

low

low

low

high

low

low

high

Seith et al. [2019]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Adusei et al. [2020]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Burns et al. [2019]

low

low

low

low

low

low

high

Decharat [2018]

high

low

low

low

low

low

high

Acquah et al. [2021]

low

high

low

high

low

low

high

high risk count

3

4

0

5

0

0

24

share of high risk

12%

15%

0

19%

0

0

92%