Skip to main content

Table 4 Hierarchical linear regression models predicting burnout

From: Interrelations of managing position with person-environment fit of gender-role orientation, and burnout

 

Masculine

Indifferent

Feminine

Androgynous

Predictor / Interaction term

\(\Delta\) Rb

βa

\(\Delta\) R2

βa

\(\Delta\) Rb

βa

\(\Delta\) Rb

βa

Step 1

0.05*

 

.07*

 

.05***

 

0.01

 

 Genderb

 

-0.23*

 

-0.28**

 

-0.17**

 

-0.07

 Age

 

-

 

-

 

-0.02

 

-0.04

Step 2

 < 0.01

 

.01

 

.01

 

0.06**

 

 Managerial positionc

 

-0.06

 

-

 

-0.04

 

-0.20**

 Number of employeesd

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 Total working time

 

-

 

-

 

0.05

 

0.06

Step 3

 < 0.01

 

.05**

 

.04**

 

.01

 

 P-E fit masculinity

 

-

 

-

 

0.15**

 

-

 P-E fit masculinity*gender

 

 < 0.01

 

-

 

-

 

-

 P-E fit masculinity* managerial position

 

-

 

0.24***

 

-

 

-0.09

Step 4

 < 0.01

 

- < 0.01

 

.05***

 

.03*

 

 P-E fit feminity

 

0.03

 

-

 

-0.22***

 

-0.24

 P-E fit feminity*gender

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

0.06

 P-E fit feminity* managerial position

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Total Rb

0.06

0.11

0.14

0.11

 Total F-Test

F (105) = 1.56 on 4, p = .19

F (122) = 7.51 on 2,, p < .001

F (303) = 8.33 on 6,, p < .001

F (189) = 2.82 on 8,, p = .006

n

110

125

310

198

  1. aβ in complete model
  2. bGender encoding: 1 = female, 2 = male
  3. cmanagerial position encoding: 1 = yes, 2 = no
  4. dNumber of employees in managerial responsibility
  5. *p < 05
  6. **p < .01
  7. ***p < .001