Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Voyage and proportion of time spent on port stays during the investigated 22 sea voyages

From: Maritime welfare facilities - utilization and relevance for the compensation of shipboard stress

Ship‘s journey

Ports

 

Cumulative termi-nals

Cumulative duration (days: hours) (% during examination voyage)

Sailing list

n

per 7 days

Port

Total

1

Hamburg (GER), Kottka (FI), Rauma (SE), Bremerhaven (GER), Hamburg (GER)

5

11

3: 14 (35.0%)

10: 6 (100%)

2a

Algeciras (ES), Hamburg (GER), Felixstove (GB), Rotterdam (NL)

4

3

3: 11 (34.0%)

10: 4 (100%)

3a

Tanger (MO), Rotterdam (NL), Tilbury (GB), Antwerpen (BE), Le Havre (FR)

5

4

4: 17 (38.0%)

12: 9 (100%)

4

Hamburg (GER), Klaipeda (LT), Riga (LV), Hamburg (GER)

4

6

3: 5 (41.2%)

7: 19 (100%)

5

Hamburg (GER), Bremerhaven (GER), Kaliningrad (RU), Hamburg (GER)

4

5

3: 1 (43.7%)

6: 23 (100%)

6

Hamburg (GER), Kottka (FI), Helsinki (FI), Hamburg (GER)

4

4

2: 18 (32.5%)

8: 11 (100%)

7

Rotterdam (NL), Dublin (IR), Rotterdam (NL)

3

5

4: 19 (57.8%)

8: 7 (100%)

8

Hamburg (GER), Copenhagen (DK), Halmstadt (SE), Szczecin (PL), Hamburg (GER)

5

7

2: 21 (47.9%)

6: 0 (100%)

9

Hamburg (GER), Oslo (NO), Frederikstadt (NO), Larvik (NO), Kristiansand (NO), Hamburg (GER)

6

8

2: 1 (31.2%)

6: 13 (100%)

10

Hamburg (GER), Immingham (GB), Felixstove (GB), Teesport (GB), Grangemouth (GB), Bremerhaven (GER)

6

7

4: 7 (47.2%)

9: 2 (100%)

11

Antwerp (BE), Dublin (IR), Felixstove (GB), Rotterdam (NL)

4

6

3: 13 (54.5%)

6: 12 (100%)

12

Rotterdam (NL), Gothenburg (SE), Rotterdam (NL)

3

4

4: 8 (58.1%)

7: 11 (100%)

13

Rotterdam (NL), Gothenburg (SE), Rotterdam (NL)

3

4

3: 20 (59.7%)

6: 10 (100%)

14

Rotterdam (NL), Arlesund (NO), Orkanger (NO), Salten (NO), Glomfjord (NO), Alesund (NO), Havik (NO), Rotterdam (NL)

8

10

7: 15 (52.2%)

14: 15 (100%)

15

Hamburg (GER), Copenhagen (DK), Halmstadt (SE), Hamburg (GER)

4

6

6: 2 (57.1%)

10: 15 (100%)

16

Hamburg (GER), Klaipeda (LT), Kaliningrad (RU), Gydnia (PO)

4

5

4: 11 (53.0%)

8: 10 (100%)

17a

Hamburg (GER), Antwerp (NL)

2

2

1: 0 (40.7%)

2: 11 (100%)

18a

Paranagua (BR), Santos (BR)

2

2

0: 23 (37.7%)

2: 13 (100%)

19a

Barcelona (ES), Valencia (ES)

2

2

1: 0 (33.3%)

3: 0 (100%)

20a

Montevideo (UY), Paranagua (BR)

2

2

1: 0 (40.0%)

2: 12 (100%)

21

Rotterdam (NL), Cork (IR), Rotterdam (NL)

3

4

3: 19 (54.3%)

7: 0 (100%)

22

Hamburg (GER), Bremerhaven (GER), Bremen (GER), Gävle (SE), Oulu (FI), Helsingborg (SE), Hamburg (GER)

7

10

5: 18 (36.5%)

15: 19 (100%)

Total

 

90

118

78: 3 (43.6%)

179: 6 (100%)

  1. aVessels operating worldwide with episodic extended sea voyages; these vessels were excluded from the total presentation (only feeder vessels)
  2. BE Belgium, BR Brazil, DK Denmark, ES Spain, FI Finland, FR France, GB Great Britain, GER Germany, IR Ireland, LT Lithuania, LV Latvia, MO Morocco, NL Netherlands, NO Norway, PL Poland, RU Russia, SE Sweden, UR Uruguay